John Sitka: John Sitka emphasizes the importance of maintaining the Trump tax cuts to support middle-class families, reduce inflation, and promote small businesses by easing regulations. He highlights how these policies contributed to record-low unemployment rates and significant wage growth for middle and low-income workers. Sitka is committed to reducing federal spending to combat inflation and stabilize the economy for all Americans. John wants to bring back the good economic times of four years ago.
Bobby Scott: Critics of Bobby Scott's tenure in Congress argue that his support for policies like increasing the minimum wage and expanding social programs has hindered economic growth and burdened small businesses. These policies, they claim, have eliminated entry-level jobs and failed to support dual-income couples. Additionally, they believe that Scott's advocacy for higher taxes and increased regulation has stifled economic opportunities, particularly for middle-class families, leading to higher inflation and making it harder for people to afford essential groceries.
Why This Matters to Democrats: John Sitka’s economic policies focus on reducing government interference and supporting small businesses, while Bobby Scott's record reflects a commitment to big government-led solutions such as raising the minimum wage and expanding social safety nets. Critics argue these programs often trap poor families in a substandard lifestyle because they fear losing their government assistance. Sitka offers a more market-driven approach, which may appeal to Democrats who are concerned about becoming overly reliant on government control of their lives. We were better off four years ago when Trump was President.
2. Immigration and Border Security: A Balanced Approach
John Sitka: Sitka advocates for strong border security and humane legal immigration policies. He emphasizes the importance of securing the border to prevent illegal immigration, which strains schools, hospitals, and the job market.
Bobby Scott: Critics of Bobby Scott’s record on immigration focus on his opposition to stricter immigration enforcement and support for sanctuary cities. They argue that these policies have strained local resources, increased competition for housing (driving up rents), and suppressed wages. They claim that Scott’s policies have led to overcrowded schools, overburdened hospitals, and higher housing costs, negatively impacting American citizens, particularly in low-income areas.
Why This Matters to Democrats: John Sitka’s approach to immigration combines strong border security with respect for the dignity of all people. While Bobby Scott has focused on policies aimed at protecting non-citizens, Sitka’s concern for the strain on schools, hospitals, and the job market resonates with many Democrats who are worried about how illegal immigration competes for resources that affect their daily lives. By advocating for balanced, humane policies that address these critical issues, Sitka positions himself as a candidate who seeks to protect the well-being of all Americans.
3. Education: Investing in Our Future
John Sitka: Sitka emphasizes expanding access to vocational training and ensuring that no student is barred from a good education because of their zip code. He advocates for school choice, allowing parents to take their education dollars to schools that best meet their children's needs. Sitka argues that good schools should not be reserved for those who can afford them, and it’s time for a Congressman who listens to parents rather than the teachers' unions.
Bobby Scott: Bobby Scott's tenure in Congress has been highlighted by his consistent alignment with teachers' unions and his support for policies that have stifled educational innovation and choice. Scott has opposed school choice initiatives, including voucher programs and charter school expansions, which Republicans believe would provide better opportunities for students in failing schools. Instead, Scott has focused on increasing federal funding for public schools and upholding the traditional public education system, which has not effectively addressed educational disparities.
Why This Matters to Democrats: John Sitka’s approach to education emphasizes the importance of parental choice and educational equity, arguing that all children, regardless of their zip code or family income, should have access to quality education. While Bobby Scott has focused on strengthening the public education system, Sitka’s advocacy for school choice and parental empowerment may appeal to Democrats who are concerned about the limited opportunities in the current system for their children. After 31 years of Scott's tenure, Sitka presents himself as a candidate ready to listen to parents and ensure every child has the chance to succeed.
4. Veterans and Military: Caring for Our Heroes
John Sitka: As a retired Navy veteran, John is committed to overhauling the VA to ensure veterans receive timely care and support. He advocates for integrating veterans into the mental health profession and emphasizes the importance of job training and placement programs. John also supports a strong national defense while avoiding unnecessary foreign interventions, focusing on protecting American lives and resources. He highlights that during Trump’s presidency, the U.S. did not enter any new wars. John believes in maintaining a strong military presence so that potential adversaries are deterred from engaging in conflict with the U.S.
Bobby Scott: A Republican critique of Bobby Scott's record on veterans' issues would point out that while Scott has supported increased funding for veterans' programs, many argue that these efforts have not led to significant improvements in the quality or efficiency of care provided by the VA. Additionally, they criticize Scott's support for defense budget cuts, which they argue have weakened America's military readiness and global standing.
Why This Matters to Democrats: John Sitka’s approach to veterans and military issues emphasizes both the need for a strong national defense and the importance of caring for those who serve. While Bobby Scott has supported funding for veterans' programs, Sitka’s firsthand experience as a veteran and his focus on reforming the VA to make it more responsive may resonate with Democrats who are concerned about the quality of care veterans receive. Additionally, Sitka’s balanced approach to military intervention—focusing on protecting American lives while avoiding unnecessary conflicts—presents him as a candidate who prioritizes both national security and the well-being of service members.
5. Environment and Energy: A Sustainable Future
John Sitka: Sitka supports the expansion of nuclear power as a key component of America’s transition to a carbon-zero future. He advocates for investments in Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Microreactors, as well as innovative approaches to recycling nuclear waste, turning environmental hazards into economic assets. Sitka believes these efforts are crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainable energy infrastructure.
Bobby Scott: Critics of Bobby Scott's record on environmental issues would highlight his support for policies that they argue have focused too much on government intervention and regulation. Scott has consistently supported legislation aimed at combating environmental challenges through federal regulations and subsidies for renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar. Republicans argue that these policies have led to increased energy costs and have not effectively reduced carbon emissions as intended. They also criticize Scott for opposing the expansion of nuclear energy, which many Republicans see as a crucial component of a sustainable energy future.
Why This Matters to Democrats: John Sitka’s approach to environmental and energy issues emphasizes practical solutions that balance environmental protection with economic growth. While Bobby Scott has championed renewable energy and regulatory measures to address environmental challenges, Sitka’s focus on nuclear energy as a reliable and sustainable power source may appeal to Democrats who are concerned about both environmental protection and energy independence. By advocating for innovative approaches to nuclear waste management and promoting the expansion of clean nuclear energy, Sitka positions himself as a candidate who offers a realistic and forward-thinking vision for a sustainable energy future.
6. Second Amendment: Protecting Rights with Common Sense
John Sitka: John Sitka supports the Second Amendment while promoting responsible gun ownership. He advocates for educational programs on safe firearm use and opposes radical gun control measures that could infringe on constitutional rights. Sitka believes in enforcing existing laws to keep guns out of the hands of criminals while protecting the rights of law-abiding citizens. He is firmly opposed to any state-proposed constitutional amendments that would ban so-called "assault weapons" by defining them as any firearm with a magazine capacity greater than 10 rounds for semi-automatic center-fire rifles and pistols, and 7 rounds for semi-automatic shotguns. Sitka also opposes any forced buyback of legally owned firearms, including those used for personal protection, as proposed by Kamala Harris for "assault weapons."
Bobby Scott: As vice-chair of the House Democratic Caucus Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, Bobby Scott's record on gun rights includes consistent support for stricter gun control measures, which Republicans argue infringe on the Second Amendment rights of Americans. Scott has supported legislation aimed at banning so-called "assault weapons," implementing universal background checks, and restricting magazine capacity. Republicans contend that these measures target law-abiding gun owners who possess firearms for self-protection rather than addressing the root causes of gun violence.
Why This Matters to Democrats: John Sitka’s approach to the Second Amendment emphasizes protecting fundamental rights while being open to practical discussions about public safety. While Bobby Scott, in his role as vice-chair of the House Democratic Caucus Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, has championed stricter gun control measures, Sitka’s balanced perspective, which focuses on responsible ownership and community safety, may resonate with Democrats who are concerned about gun violence but also value constitutional rights. Many Democrats might also oppose a forced buyback of their personal protection pistols, especially those that hold more than 10 rounds, as would be affected by the Virginia amendment or by similar federal proposals like Kamala Harris's. By advocating for a common-sense approach that respects both safety and freedom, Sitka presents himself as a candidate who understands the complexities of gun policy in America
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.